Paul McCartney

Birth Name: James Paul McCartney

Place of Birth: Liverpool North, Lancashire, England, U.K.

Date of Birth: 18 June, 1942

Ethnicity: Irish, English, Manx/Isle of Man, Ulster-Scots, Scottish, at least 1/32 Welsh

Paul McCartney is a British singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, composer, and actor. He was a member of the band The Beatles, along with George Harrison, John Lennon, and Ringo Starr.

Paul is the son of Mary Patricia (Mohin) and James McCartney. Paul is married to Nancy Shevell. He was previously married to musician, photographer, and animal rights activist Linda McCartney, until her death, and to model and anti-landmine campaigner Heather Mills. He has five children: four, including fashion designer Stella McCartney, with Linda; and a daughter with Heather.

His father was of Irish, English, Isle of Man/Manx, Ulster-Scots, Scottish, and 1/16th Welsh, ancestry. His mother was of Irish, and some English, descent.

Paul’s paternal grandfather was Joseph McCartney (the son of James McCartney and Elizabeth Williams). Joseph was born in Liverpool, Lancashire, England. James was the son of James McCartney, who was from Ireland, and of Ann Tate, who was born in Scotland, or of Sarah Tomlinson. Elizabeth was the daughter of George Williams and Eliza Whitfield; her own grandfather, William Williams, was Welsh, from Mold, Flintshire.

Paul’s paternal grandmother was Margaret Florence Clegg (the daughter of Paul Clegg and Jane Claque/Clague). Margaret Florence was born in Everton, Lancashire, England. Paul and Jane were born on the Isle of Man, with Jane being from St Anne. Paul was the son of Robert Clegg and Elizabeth Commish/Comish. Jane was the daughter of Thomas Claque/Clague and Esther Kneen.

Paul’s maternal grandfather was Owen Mohan/Mohin (the son of Owen Mohan and Mary McGeogh). Paul’s grandfather Owen was born in Tullynamalrow, County Monaghan, Ireland, and changed his surname from Mohan to Mohin. Paul’s great-grandfather Owen was the son of Michael Mohan. Mary was the daughter of Michael McGough.

Paul’s maternal grandmother was Mary Theresa Danher (the daughter of John Danaher/Danher/Dahnher and Jane Baines). Mary Theresa was born in Liverpool. John was born in Limerick, Ireland, the son of John Danaher. Jane was English, born in Dudley, England, the daughter of John Beanes/Baines and Elizabeth Cook.

Sources: Genealogies of Paul McCartney – http://www.geni.com
http://worldconnect.rootsweb.ancestry.com
http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com
https://gw.geneanet.org

Family history of Paul McCartney – http://www.beatlesireland.info

Genealogies of Paul McCartney (focusing on his father’s side) – http://www.wikitree.com
http://en.rodovid.org

Notes on Paul McCartney’s ancestry – https://hergestgenealogy.wordpress.com

image via DFree / Shutterstock.com

38 Replies to “Paul McCartney”

  1. Paul’s McCartney-ancestors are of Ulster-Scots origin; his sixth great-grandfather, Andrew MacIntosh, was born in County Armagh, Northern Ireland, to Scottish parents. How much of Paul’s father’s ancestry is Ulster-Scots is unclear; the family converted to Catholicism at some point.

    https://gw.geneanet.org/tdowling?lang=sv&n=mccartney&oc=0&p=james+paul&type=tree
    http://en.rodovid.org/wk/Special:Tree/26955
    http://www.beatlesireland.info/Irish%20Heritage/paulheritage.html

  2. I agree that Scotland’s peak in terms of scientific achievement was in the past, but to suggest that the Irish were on the same par is ridiculous. And of the significant Irish inventors that existed during that time, a lot of them were Anglo or Scots Irish. I’m not having a go at the Irish, I’m just sick of so many people of this site putting down Scotland and England or exaggerating Ireland’s relevance.

  3. he looks nothing like he did in the 60s.. even in the 70s he looks nothing like he did. I’m starting to believe this Paul is really a fraud, i mean tall with blue eyes? really? the opposite of what he was in the 60s.

    1. He’s never appeared to be short. He’s said to be 5’11″” which is consistent with how tall he appears to be in all footage of him from the early 1960s till today.

      As far as his eye color, he has dark hazel eyes. Such eyes appear brown in black and white photos and often appear brown in color photos as well depending on the lighting circumstances. In bright lights his eyes may look lighter and show hints of green or blue or gray.

      In his youth with his dark, nearly black colored hair and eyebrows and facial hair could make him look much darker than he was depending on the lighting circumstances. He could be taken for an Italian in some pics from the late 60s and 70s.

      But he’s actually quite pale skinned and in person or in a sufficiently well lit photo his eyes look more like a dark shade of blue/green/grey than the brown hue they often appear in b/w or insufficiently lit or insufficiently close photos.

      1. Well, that’s incredible. Since Italians are alwais stereotyped as dark-haired (which is partially true, because they’re quite heterogeneous looking), it seems that any brunette-haired person automatically looks Italian. That is not the case.

  4. He definitely has some Scottish blood way back – his brother did some research that confirmed it. The actual name McCartney is Scottish as well.

    As a Scotsman myself, I get a bit frustrated how Scotland seems to get ignored a lot on this site. Lots of Americans are referred to as being of Irish descent when they have Scottish names, and in reality their ancestors probably moved from Scotland to America via a spell in Northern Ireland.

    1. I completely disagree.They are being referred to as “Scots Irish” in these cases.Somebody on this site as at pains to make clear distinctions between the two.
      It all depends on how far you want to go back.The McCartney surname has its origins in Ireland.Paul’s McCartney line probably returned to Ireland 800 years ago as part of the Gallowglass,long before the plantations.
      If you want to start going on about Irish names vs Scottish then you are getting into a very grey area.There is a lot of crossover.
      Paul is certainly a Gael.If the Scots wish to dispense with that part of their heritage then that’s their problem.

  5. That´s so obvious, in Liverpool almost everybody has Irish or/and Welsh ancestry, the Irish and Welsh migration was even bigger than English in Liverpool so more than half of population have that ancestry.

  6. He is half English (father), half ‘Irish’ (Mother) -though her family had long
    settled in Blackpool/Liverpool. Interestingly, on his mother’s side, like George Harrison,
    he is a descendant of Anglo-Norman knights (Viking blood, Frankish culture)
    who came over to settle eastern Eire, with ‘Lord’ Richard Strongbow (a real son of a bitch),
    in around, I believe, the late 1100’s. FACT: He was raised Anglican, not Catholic, as
    has been claimed.

        1. It isn’t historically correct to say the Irish brought the names to Scotland, since Ireland as a nation didn’t exist till a later date. So they wouldn’t have been Irish technically.

          1. Scots Gaelic is different from Irish Gaelic.

            The Scots and the Irish aren’t very similar culturally, all though people try to push the Celtic connection. The Scottish tend to be more intellectually driven (and have made many scientific discoveries) as apposed to the Irish who are more artistically driven. Saying that people of Scottish descent seem to be more artistically driven than the Scots themselves.

            Also the differences in religious beliefs and ideals is significant.

          2. Scots Gaelic is of course similar to Irish Gaelic. Scots Gaelic is an offshoot of Irish Gaelic. They have differences now due to separation.
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Scottish_Gaelic_and_Irish
            There are many similarities in culture music and whisky/whiskey being obvious ones.
            A lot of what Scotland is famous for is from the Gaelic part of their culture.
            All of the British Isles were Catholic at one time. The lack of scientific discoveries made by the Irish might have something to do with the heavy discrimination of the Catholic Irish by the British not that they were less intellectual than the Scots. The Catholic Irish were excluded from universities and were educated at hedge schools so they received the most basic of education. Basically they weren’t allowed to have an education and had difficulties even making any kind of living as most of the Catholics weren’t allowed own land. By 1778, Protestants owned 95 percent of the land.
            http://www.historyplace.com/worldhistory/famine/before.htm
            The Scottish and Welsh did not suffer the same scale of oppression that occurred to the Irish due to the religious differences. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholicism_in_the_United_Kingdom

          3. That wasn’t an insult to the Irish, the Scottish are just an intellectual group. Scotland has the third highest scientific papers per capita in the world. People of Scottish descent are the highest represented in the physical sciences in America and the second most likely ethnicity to graduate college. There the second highest per capita ethnicity amongst doctors in America and the highest in both Canada and Australia. All of this is disproportionate to there percentage of the population within these nations.

          4. Thanks Hotdog for the clarification. It did read like a putdown to the Irish but I can see that was not your intention. I agree that the Scots have a lot to be proud of. For a little country they have punched way above their weight.

          1. I really believe that no population is better than another. I think that some populations have a much more difficult journey than others. Some people just face much more discrimination and negative stereotyping. If everyone was given an equal chance to excel things would be different. Whatever anyone says about our modern times one of the positive aspects is that people don’t put labels on a whole nationality or race. Every nation have their geniuses and their dickheads.

    1. To say that the Scots are “intellectually driven” is bogus and self serving.The Scots no doubt had the Enlightenment,but that was 200 years ago and confined to a small number of educated individuals.There is little trace of it in the modern Scot and there was never any trace of it in the Ulster Scot,who are the exact same ethnicity.
      Per capita differences in the publishing of scientific papers between Ireland and UK are negligible.
      Religious differences are 400 years old.Before the Normans there was a lot of cultural crossover which is why we have ambiguity with names,language and other cultural pointers.
      Not all Mc’s indicate an Irish origin but McCartney is a name of Irish origin and a branch of the McCarthy’s of Munster.

      1. If the Scots were so clever how come they call themselves by the Irish name, “Scots”?
        They despised the Highlanders as “Irish”, their language they called “Erse”, a derogatory term. Yet the Gaelic culture is the one that signifies Scotland today!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.